Engineering Semantic Web Information Systems in Hera

Engineering Semantic Web Information Systems in Hera

Richard Vdovjak, Flavius Frasincar, Geert-Jan Houben, and Peter Barna
Eindhoven University of Technology
P.O. Box 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands
{ richardv, flaviusf, houben, pbarna }@win.tue.nl

ABSTRACT

Web Information Systems (WIS) use the Web paradigm and Web technologies to retrieve information from sources connected to the Web, and to present the information in a Web hypermedia presentation to the user. Hera, a model-driven WIS design methodology specifies the process of integrating Web data and transforming it to a hypermedia presentation to be browsed by an end-user. The process is divided into the following principal phases: integration and data retrieval, and presentation generation.

Keywords

WIS, RDF(S), Semantic Web, XSLT, WIS engineering

1. INTRODUCTION

The diverse audience of the World Wide Web with different platforms (e.g. PC, PDA, WAP phone) causes the one-size-fits-all approach typical for the design of traditional information systems not to be suitable for Web Information System (WIS) [5] design. Adaptation of the presented content based on a concrete user and platform is a vital feature of a WIS. Moreover, the dynamic nature of Web data asks for the automated generation of hypermedia presentations as WIS output. The main issue in WIS design is therefore the specification of the hypermedia generation process including the specification of which sources to use and how to integrate their data into the system.

There are several engineering frameworks for WIS design, e.g. XAHM [2], WebML [3], UWE [7], and Araneus [9]. This paper presents our model-driven approach called Hera and introduces the transformation software that builds the heart of the hypermedia presentation generation process.

2. HERA METHODOLOGY

A WIS in the Hera perspective generates a hypermedia presentation in response to a user query. The data is retrieved from the data repository composed of heterogeneous data sources distributed over the Web.

During the generation of the output we distinguish the following phases: integration and data retrieval, and presentation generation. Figure 1 shows the details of the phases described in the following sections.

We chose to represent all information in RDF(S) [1, 8] because of the flexibility (supporting schema refinement) and extensibility (allowing the definition of new concepts and properties) of RDFS. Due to the lack of full-fledged RDF-aware transformation processors and thanks to the XML serialization of RDF, we use an XSLT processor (Saxon 7.0) for our model transformations. For the purposes of data retrieval we use an advanced RDF(S) query language: RQL [6].


Figure 1
Figure 1: Hera methodology

3. INTEGRATION AND DATA RETRIEVAL

In the integration and data retrieval phase several autonomous sources are connected to a conceptual model by creating channels through which the data will populate the concepts from a conceptual model on request.

The Conceptual Model (CM) provides a uniform semantic view over multiple data sources and describes a problem domain. CM is composed of concepts and concept properties that together define the domain ontology.

The Integration Model (IM) addresses the problem of relating concepts from the source ontologies to those from the CM. This problem can also be seen as the problem of merging or aligning ontologies. The efforts to automate the solution to this problem usually do not offer good results. In our approach we currently rely on a domain expert to articulate CM concepts in the semantic language of sources. By instantiating the integration model ontology the designer specifies the links between the CM and the sources.

The Integration Model Ontology (IMO) is a meta-ontology describing integration primitives that are used both for ranking the sources within a cluster and for specifying links between them and the CM. The main concepts in the IMO are Decoration and Articulation.

Decorations serve as a means to label "appropriateness" of different sources (and their concepts) grouped within one semantically close cluster, while Articulations describe actual links between the CM and the source ontologies and clarify also the notion of the concept's uniqueness which is necessary to perform joins from several sources.

While the integration phase (instantiating the IM) is performed only once, prior to the generation of the presentation, the data retrieval phase is performed for every query. In this phase the query is extended and split into several sub-queries which are then routed to the appropriate sources. Subsequently, the results are gathered and transformed into a CM instance.

4. PRESENTATION GENERATION

In the presentation generation phase the retrieved data is transformed into a hypermedia presentation suitable for the user platform and for the user preferences. The presentation generation is composed from three steps: the application model generation, the application model instance generation, and the presentation data generation.

The Application Model (AM) describes the navigational aspects of the hypermedia presentation. The AM is composed of slices and slice relationships (aggregation and navigation) that together define the navigation ontology. A slice is a meaningful presentation unit of some media items originating from different CM concepts.

In the application model generation the AM is converted to an AM template (an "empty" AM instance). In the application model instance generation the AM is instantiated with the retrieved data. The adaptation (association of appearance conditions to slice references based on the User/Platform Profile) is also realized in this step. In the presentation data generation the application model instance is translated to browser interpretable code. Figure 2 depicts how three different translations appear in three different browsers: HTML browser, WML browser, and SMIL browser.


Figure 2
Figure 2: Hypermedia presentation in different browsers

5. CONCLUSIONS

Hera is a model-driven methodology which uses different models for different aspects involved in the design of Web information systems. This paper briefly describes Hera's integration model and the adaptable application model in order to support an automated process of generating adaptable hypermedia presentations from different sources. As a Web ontology language is still in its infancy [4] we chose to represent Hera models in RDF(S). In order to represent the different Hera models we provided appropriate RDF(S) extensions. The RDF/XML model serialization enabled the use of XSLT stylesheets as transformation specifications between the different model instances. This approach proved to be satisfactory as one does not need to use the RDF(S) inference rules in the transformation specification.

As future work we plan to use (depending on their existence): a mature Web ontology language for representing the Hera models and a Web ontology-aware (or at least an RDF(S)-aware) transformation language to be used for the specification of the Hera transformations.

6. REFERENCES

  1. Dan Brickley and R.V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Technical Report WD rdf-schema, World Wide Web Consortium, 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-schema.
  2. Mario Cannataro, Alfredo Cuzzocrea, Carlo Mastroianni, Riccardo Ortale, and Andrea Pugliese. Modeling Adaptive Hypermedia with an Object-Oriented Approach and XML. In Second International Workshop on Web Dynamics, 2002. http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/webDyn2/proceedings/cannataro_adaptive_hypermedia.pdf.
  3. Stefano Ceri, Piero Fraternali, and Maristella Matera. Conceptual Modeling of Data-Intensive Web Applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(4):20-30, 2002.
  4. Frank van Harmelen, James Hendler, Jan Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Lynn Andrea Stein. Web Ontology Language (OWL) Reference Version 1.0. Technical Report WD owl-ref, World Wide Web Consortium, 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref.
  5. Tomas Isakowitz, Michael Bieber, and Fabio Vitali. Web Information Systems. Communications of the ACM, 41(1):78-80, 1998.
  6. Gregory Karvounarakis, Vassilis Christophides, Dimitris Plexousakis, and Sofia Alexaki. Querying RDF Descriptions for Community Web Portals. In 17iemes Journees Bases de Donnees Avancees, pp. 133-144, 2001.
  7. Nora Koch, Andreas Kraus, and Rolf Hennicker. The Authoring Process of the UML-based Web Engineering Approach. In First International Workshop on Web-Oriented Software Technology 2001. http://www.dsic.upv.es/~west2001/iwwost01/files/contributions/NoraKoch/Uwe.pdf
  8. Graham Klyne and Jeremy J. Carroll. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Technical Report WD rdf-concepts, World Wide Web Consortium, 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts.
  9. Giansalvatore Mecca, Paolo Atzeni, Allessandro Masci, Paolo Merialdo, and Giuseppe Sindoni. The Araneus Web-Base Management System. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, ACM, pp. 544-546, 1998.